Some people are so prejudiced. Especially when it comes to big corporations. In G20 week, the motives of world business are under greater scrutiny than ever.
The more I look, however … and I look a lot, the more I find that most market leaders have been working diligently behind the scenes for years to take the right actions. The people who work there are no different to you and me.
So, I was reassured when Coca-Cola recently published the carbon footprints of its main brands in Britain.
First, it undertook a complete life cycle analysis, including:
- ingredients
- packaging
- manufacturing
- distribution
- storage and refrigeration
- consumer use and disposal.
Second, it provided actual figures per pack:
CO2e emissions |
Pack
in litres |
Grams
per pack
|
Grams
per litre
|
| Coca-Cola | Glass 0.33 |
360 |
1091 |
| Coca-Cola | Can 0.33 |
170 |
515 |
| Diet Coke/Coke Zero | Can 0.33 |
150 |
454 |
| Coca-Cola | PET 0.5 |
240 |
480 |
| Coca-Cola | PET 2.0 |
500 |
250 |
| Diet Coke/Coke Zero | PET 2.0 |
400 |
200 |
| Oasis | Glass 0.375 |
340 |
907 |
| Oasis | PET 0.5 |
240 |
480 |
Notably, packaging accounted for between 30% and 70% of the total. Recycling a 33cl Coca-Cola can would reduce its footprint by 41% to 100 grams.
Third, it showed how far it has already moved to reduce emissions:
- 50% recycled content in aluminium cans
- 40% recycled glass in glass bottles
- 25% recycled PET in PET across Europe in 2010.
This seems an intelligent example for others to follow. If you would like assistance for your own company’s calculation and improvement, Zenith has a dedicated Sustainability Consulting team that would be delighted to help.
2 comments:
Hello Richard,
Thank you for sharing Coca-Cola`s carbon footprint reporting with us - very interesting.
I would like to know more but the link provided in the newsletter was broken.
Would you please update the link.
Kind regards,
Tess Dawson
Fluid Fashions, Australia
Thanks and sorry. Link should now have been refreshed.
Post a Comment